Danes say no to more EU

A note on ‘ever closer union.’ Danish voters have said ‘no’ to it, going against the recommendations of the ruling political party and the opposition, both of whom had campaigned for ‘yes.’ What was at stake?

Denmark had ‘opt outs’ from the EU’s criminal justice and home affairs system via negotiations in 1993. The ‘opt outs’ preserved Danish sovereignty in legal matters and prevented a kind of ‘cross border’ policing. The Danish government wanted to give up those ‘opt outs.’

53% of Danish voters said no to that. If you want to know why, make sure you read part one of the interview Charlie Morris did with Steven Baker a few weeks ago. As Charlie pointed out to me the other night, a Croatian police officer could arrest and extradite a British citizen on British soil under the EU’s criminal justice and home affairs system.

That kind of centralisation of judicial and police power is far beyond what anyone would have expected when they agreed to join a common European market. It shows you—or me anyway—that the ‘ever closer union’ means ever fewer British liberties. The Danes know that too. Does the British public? Do British political elites? We’ll find out next year.

Category: Economics

From time to time we may tell you about regulated products issued by Southbank Investment Research Limited. With these products your capital is at risk. You can lose some or all of your investment, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Seek independent advice if you are unsure of the suitability of any investment. Southbank Investment Research Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 706697. https://register.fca.org.uk/.

© 2021 Southbank Investment Research Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No 9539630. VAT No GB629 7287 94.
Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Crowne House, 56-58 Southwark Street, London, SE1 1UN.

Terms and conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | FAQ | Contact Us | Top ↑